Donald Trump put disability in the spotlight, but not in the way these advocates hoped.

The teenage boy in the campaign ad has a noticeable limp — and something to say.

“I want a president who inspires me,” Dante Latchman says in the spot produced by a pro-Hillary Clinton super PAC, “and that’s not Donald Trump.”

The 17-year-old, who was disabled by a rare cancer of the spine, is one of several people with disabilities who have played a visible role in the 2016 campaign. There was Grace, a young girl with spina bifida, in another pro-Clinton ad. There was blind singer Timmy Kelly, who performed the national anthem at the Democratic National Convention. Anastasia Somoza, an activist with cerebral palsy, addressed the same crowd from her wheelchair onstage.

It’s the kind of political spotlight that disability rights advocates have craved for years — but the particular dynamics have left them feeling conflicted. The impetus for much of the focus came from one incendiary moment in the campaign, when Trump publicly mocked the physical disability of a New York Times reporter.

And for some advocates, the result has been an overly simplistic discussion of the issues facing the disabled.

“You shouldn’t mock anyone. But people have really zeroed in on this particular instance,” said Emily Ladau, a blogger and disability activist who said she thinks that the Democratic ads used disabled people as props to pull voters’ heartstrings. “People still pity disabled people, or they’re ‘inspired’ by us. But we’re not yet recognized as a legitimate voting bloc.”

So she made a video with the Rooted in Rights project, in which she rolls her wheelchair alongside the Capitol as she tries to steer the conversation back to what she sees as the real issues.

“It’s one thing to talk about mocking a person with a disability. But it’s different to say, ‘Okay, so what are we going to do about it?’ ” she says. “How are we going to make them respected members of our community? How are we going to ensure that inclusive education is a priority across the country? How are we going to ensure that they have employment, that they all have health care, that all buildings are held responsible for complying with the Americans With Disabilities Act?”

The incident in which the Republican presidential nominee imitated journalist Serge Kovaleski — who has a condition known as arthrogryposis that limits his arm motion — opened a debate about Trump’s capacities for empathy and diplomacy. A recent Bloomberg Politics poll found that voters deemed it the most bothersome moment of his campaign

Kovaleski drew Trump’s ire after he was interviewed on TV denying that a 2001 story he wrote provided confirmation of Trump’s widely discredited claim of having seen news footage of U.S. Muslims celebrating the 9/11 attacks. At a rally shortly thereafter, Trump scoffed at the journalist’s account, saying that “you’ve got to see this guy,” while jerking his arms in front of his body. Kovaleski, a former Washington Post staffer, declined to comment for this story.

The episode made headlines for days. And the video of Trump is still in wide circulation — a key part of the Dante Latchman testimonial for Clinton. “I don’t want a president who makes fun of me,” he says in the ad.

Alice Wong, who co-founded a social-media campaign known as #CripTheVote, intended to raise disability issues in the 2016 race and shares Ladau’s concern that the current debate“plays on the notion that disabled people are vulnerable and need to be protected.”

But some activists think Trump’s callous behavior was a favor in disguise. Disability received barely a mention in the 2012 presidential election, says Jennifer Mizrahi, president of the nonpartisan nonprofit group RespectAbility USA.

“Because of what Mr. Trump did, it elevated the issue,” Mizrahi says. “At both conventions, you saw individuals with disabilities speaking themselves, you saw the platforms of the two parties be more substantive and thoughtful on disability issues, and you see that voters are starting to answer and ask a lot more of these questions.”

It wasn’t the ideal way to draw attention to disability, Mizrahi says, but “it put the issue on the table.”